Strength of Recommendations: Weak.
Quality of Evidence: Low, from Class III studies and indirect evidence.
Adult and Pediatrics
Asymmetry is defined as > 1mm difference in diameter. A fixed pupil is defined as < 1mm response to bright light
| Reference | Data Class | Description of Study | Conclusion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chesnut, 1994 | III | Retrospective review of 608 patients from 1983-1988 with GCS < 8 to evaluate pupil asymmetry as localizing predictor of intracranial lesion. | > 1mm anisocoria: 40% sensitive, 67% specific. All anisocoria: 25% sensitive, 92% specific. Pupil size did not predict mass or location. Pupil asymmetry was less predictive in children than in adults. |
| Jiang, 2002 | III | Retrospective review of 846 patients to determine factors affecting prognosis, including GCS, age, pupil response, hypoxia, hyperthermia and elevated ICP. | Bilateral pupil abnormalities: 62% mortality. Bilateral normal pupils: 17% mortality. |
| Mamelak, 1996 | III | Retrospective review of 672 patients with GCS < 8 on admission and remained comatose > 6 hours Logistic regression of factors affecting outcome on admission and at 24 hours (age, pupil exam, motor exam). | Age was the most important independent predictor of outcome. Predictive strength of motor exam was greater than pupil exam. |
| Schreiber, 2002 | III | Retrospective review of prospective databank of Level I trauma center from 1994 to 2000 from 418 consecutive patients age 13-88 years using univariate logistic regression to evaluate factors determining mortality, including BP, midline shift, elevated ICP, nonreactive pupil on one side, and GCS. | Independent risk factors for mortality: hypotension and intracranial hypertension. GCS and age together were significant predictors of mortality. Data not broken down by age. |
| Signorini, 1999 | III | Retrospective review of 372 consecutive moderate and severe TBI patients from 1989-1991, age > 14 years (mean age 42). Multiple logistic regression analysis of 5 factors (age, GCS, ISS, pupil exam and CT scan) on 1 year outcome. | Bilateral blown pupils: 40% survival. Bilateral reactive pupils: 90% survival. Data not classified by age. |
| Chan, 2005 | III | Prospective study of 265 patients aged 2-18 years admitted from 1998 to 2001 with minor TBI to two trauma centers to evaluate differences in the two populations (urban and rural) that affected patient outcomes using multiple logistic regression | Clinical predictors of intracranial injury were headache (OR 20.8, CI 3.9-25.2), unequal pupils (OR 8.4, CI 4.3-17.9) and GCS=13 (OR 3.8, CI 1.9-6.8). Detailed clinical exam was of no diagnostic value in detecting injuries found on CT. |
| Halley, 2004 | III | Prospective descriptive study of 98 isolated TBI patients aged 2-16 years in 1-year period, with loss of consciousness or amnesia, that received CT scans to evaluate the diagnostic value of CT. | 13 % had CT abnormality. 33% with CT abnormality had normal neurologic exam. |
| Massagli, 1996 | III | Retrospective review of 33 patients < 17 years to determine predictors of outcome at hospital discharge, and 5 and 7 years post discharge | Pupillary response was significantly associated GOS scores at 5-7 years (p = .001). |
| McCabe, 2001 | III | Retrospective review of 30 consecutive patients with "shaken baby syndrome" aged -39 months, to determine prognostic indicators including pupil response, midline shift, and ventilatory requirements | 8 of 30 patients (27%) had bilateral fixed pupils on arrival with 100% mortality for those patients. |
The pupillary exam is an essential component of the post-traumatic neurological exam. It consists of assessment of the size, symmetry and reaction to light of both pupils. The light reflex depends on a properly functioning lens, retina, optic nerve, brain stem, and oculomotor nerve (cranial nerve III). The direct pupil response assesses unilateral function of the III nerve; the consensual response assesses the function of the contralateral III nerve. Absence or asymmetry of these reflexes may indicate a herniation syndrome or ischemia of the brain stem.
Pupillary asymmetry less than 1 mm is normal and has no pathologic significance.10 In one study of 310 healthy volunteers with 2,432 paired measurements using advanced technology, asymmetry of pupillary size greater than 0.5 mm was seen in less than 1% of patients and was rarely seen in TBI patients unless the ICP exceeded 20 mm Hg.
Increased intracranial pressure resulting in uncal herniation compresses cranial nerve III, resulting in a reduction of parasympathetic tone to the pupillary constrictor fibers, producing a dilated pupil with decreased reactivity. Destruction of the nerve also results in a dilated and fixed pupil. Bilaterally dilated and fixed pupils are consistent with direct brain stem injury, as well as with marked elevation of ICP. Metabolic or cardiovascular disturbances including hypoxemia, hypotension, and hypothermia are associated with dilated pupils and abnormal reactivity, making it necessary to resuscitate and stabilize the patient before assessing pupillary function.
Direct trauma to cranial nerve III in the absence of significant intracranial injury or herniation may result in pupillary abnormalities usually associated with ocular motor deficits. Asymmetric pupillary constriction can make the contralateral pupil appear dilated. Following trauma, as the result of a carotid dissection, sympathetic chain function may be impaired, resulting in Horner's syndrome.4 These patients also have ptosis associated with the miotic eye, with the contralateral "dilated" pupil having a normal brisk constriction to light. This assessment may be difficult in the field.
Pupillary function may be an indicator of brain injury after trauma, but it is neither a specific indicator of injury severity or involved anatomy. Nevertheless, studies support the assessment of pupillary functions in the acute setting of trauma as both a guide to immediate medical decision making, and as a long term prognosticator.
For this update Medline was searched from 1996 through July 2006 using the search strategy for this question (see Appendix B), and results were supplemented with literature recommended by peers or identified from reference lists. For adult studies, of 24 potentially relevant publications, 5 were used as evidence for this topic. For pediatric studies, of 9 potentially relevant publications 4 were used as evidence for this topic. (Note: In the previous edition of these guidelines, there were no evidence tables for this topic.)
Asymmetry is defined as > 1mm difference in diameter. A fixed pupil is defined as < 1mm response to bright light
Adult
Foundation. The relationship of pupillary findings in the field to outcome has not been studied. Though there are no prehospital data, studies frominhospital settings support a relationship between pupillary findings and outcome.
Chesnut et al. retrospectively analyzed data from 608 patients with severe TBI to assess the reliability of pupillary asymmetry in predicting the presence and location of intracranial mass lesions.
Mamelak et al. studied 672 TBI patients aged 0 - 80+ years. They found that age was the most important predictor of outcome, followed by initial motor exam and then by pupil response, demonstrating some correlation between pupillary response and outcome.
Pediatrics
Foundation. There are few studies that specifically address the pupillary assessment in children following TBI. A prospective study of 98 pediatric patients found that 33% of those with aCT scan abnormality had a normal neurologic exam.
Massagli et al. studied 33 pediatric TBI patients and found that severity score and initial pupillary response were significantly related to long term outcome after 5-7 years, measured by the GOS (Glasgow Outcome Scale).
The prehospital and inhospital environments are significantly different. In the field pupillary exam is difficult to perform and is less reliable than when performed in the hospital. Given that prehospital providers are increasingly involved in decision making regarding therapeutic interventions and transport destinations, it is important to further investigate methods of enhancing accuracy of assessment measures such as pupillary examination. The following key questions need to be addressed: